Hi Alex,

Yes, you are right, class JstatdTest has the code that is supposed to handle 
the "port in use" 
case but at least for this specific test sun/tools/jstatd/TestJstatdPort.java 
is doesn't work.

Since there are multiple tests in sun/tools/jstatd/* folder that use this class 
and different ports
 might be subject to the "port in use" error and taking into account that it's 
hard to reproduce such case
I found it safer to leave the original code and just augment it with what was 
missing for this specific
 case rather than completely replacing it.

Best regards,
Daniil

On 3/16/20, 4:02 PM, "Alex Menkov" <alexey.men...@oracle.com> wrote:

    Hi Daniil,
    
    Looks like the test is supposed to handle "port in use" issue (see lines 
    103-114).
    I suppose in case "port in use" jstatd exits, but 
    ProcessTools.startProcess() continue to wait for "jstatd started" message.
    
    --alex
    
    On 03/16/2020 12:00, Daniil Titov wrote:
    > Please review the change [1] that fixes the intermittent failure of the 
test.
    > 
    > The problem here is that if the RMI port is in use than the test keep 
waiting for "jstatd started (bound to " to appear in the process output and in 
this case
    > It doesn't happen.
    > 
    >   at 
java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch.await(java.base@15-internal/CountDownLatch.java:232)
    >   at jdk.test.lib.process.ProcessTools.startProcess(ProcessTools.java:205)
    >   at jdk.test.lib.process.ProcessTools.startProcess(ProcessTools.java:133)
    >   at jdk.test.lib.process.ProcessTools.startProcess(ProcessTools.java:254)
    >   at 
jdk.test.lib.thread.ProcessThread$ProcessRunnable.xrun(ProcessThread.java:153)
    >   at jdk.test.lib.thread.XRun.run(XRun.java:40)
    >   at java.lang.Thread.run(java.base@15-internal/Thread.java:832)
    >   at jdk.test.lib.thread.TestThread.run(TestThread.java:123)
    > 
    > Testing: Mach5 tests for sun/tools/jstatd/ successfully passed.  
Tier1-tier3 tests are still in progress.
    > 
    > [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8240711/webrev.01/
    > [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240711
    > 
    > 
    > Thank you,
    > Daniil
    > 
    > 
    > 
    


Reply via email to