On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 23:16:50 GMT, Alex Menkov <amen...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>  Had to implement runtime check (instead of using @requires) because 
> resexhausted001 is also called by resexhausted004.

So does that mean you do or don't want resexhausted004 disabled on windows? If 
yes, there's no reason why you can't use @requires in the TestDescriptions.java 
for each of these tests (although I have no objecting to the runtime check). If 
no then you have a bug because you are disabling resexhausted004 on windows, 
and should use @requires in TestDescriptions.java for resexhausted001 instead.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1046

Reply via email to