On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 21:44:09 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > > > Had to implement runtime check (instead of using @requires) because > > resexhausted001 is also called by resexhausted004. > > So does that mean you do or don't want resexhausted004 disabled on windows? > If yes, there's no reason why you can't use @requires in the > TestDescriptions.java for each of these tests (although I have no objecting > to the runtime check). If no then you have a bug because you are disabling > resexhausted004 on windows, and should use @requires in TestDescriptions.java > for resexhausted001 instead. resexhausted004 calls resexhausted001-003 (their run method) in random order (to ensure we can get several ResourceExhausted events) I don't want to disable resexhausted004 on Windows completely, just skip resexhausted001 ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1046
