On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:44:46 GMT, Kevin Walls <kev...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Since 8214300, jcmd cannot attach to a Java process in a docker container.
> 
> That change started using a canonicalized File to create the .attach_pidXXX 
> file.  For a target process in a container, it will follow a symlink that is 
> likely not the same as for the target process.  e.g. follow a symlink to a 
> cwd of / which is not the same directory for the container host, as it is 
> within the container.  Containerized VM never sees the file, never creates 
> the socket file, the attach times out and fails.
> 
> To keep the 8214300 change working for non-container situations, we can keep 
> a canonical version of the attach File to use for deleting.
> 
> For containers there will remain the problem 8214300 describes, although it 
> is unlikely: if you start the attach to a containerized VM,  and it then 
> exits, we can't delete the .attach_pidXXX file.  Neither the /proc/PID/cwd or 
> canonical form are any use.
> 
> (Possibly leaving a .attach_pidXXX file if the target dies in that small 
> window is better than the current situation.)
> 
> Here I'm suggesting the same change on AIX, although I can't build/test that. 
>  I'm expecting it has the same problem, as /proc/pid/cwd is still a symlink.

Thanks @kevinjwalls ! I thought we can get real location from 
`/proc/<PID>/root`, however it do not so. I confirmed it on podman. (podman 
uses overlayfs, and I couldn't find an easy way to access it directly.

Your change almost looks good, but I have only one comment.

src/jdk.attach/linux/classes/sun/tools/attach/VirtualMachineImpl.java line 81:

> 79:             File f = createAttachFile(pid, ns_pid);
> 80:             // Keep a canonical version of File, to delete, in case 
> target process ends and /proc link has gone:
> 81:             File f2 = f.getCanonicalFile();

Do we need to keep `f`? I think we can replace them to `createAttachFile(pid, 
ns_pid).getCanonicalFile()`.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4418

Reply via email to