On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 14:05:48 GMT, Lin Zang <lz...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I think it may be because this is actually not a JavaThread. So the assert
>> in `Mutex::check_no_safepoint_state` would pass.
>> Moreover, I have tried to use `PaddedMonitor(Mutex::nosafepoint,
>> "ParallelHProfWriter_lock", Mutex::_safepoint_check_never);` here, but the
>> slowdebug would report errors as you mentioned in JDK-8274245.
>
> I agree the flag here and at the place of lock acquiring seems problematic.
> I will try to see whether I can use `Mutex::_safepoint_check_never` here and
> get rid of the assert.
yes
void Mutex::check_no_safepoint_state(Thread* thread) {
check_block_state(thread);
assert(!thread->is_active_Java_thread() || _safepoint_check_required !=
_safepoint_check_always,
"This lock should always have a safepoint check for Java threads:
%s",
name());
}
yes, we exclude the check for a non-java thread, which I thought was an odd
exclusion last time I looked. I pass the tests in
sun/tools/jmap/BasicJMapTest.java so maybe leave it for now?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5681
