On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 15:01:26 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <cole...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I agree the flag here and at the place of lock acquiring seems problematic.
>> I will try to see whether I can use `Mutex::_safepoint_check_never` here and
>> get rid of the assert.
>
> yes
> void Mutex::check_no_safepoint_state(Thread* thread) {
> check_block_state(thread);
> assert(!thread->is_active_Java_thread() || _safepoint_check_required
> != _safepoint_check_always,
> "This lock should always have a safepoint check for Java
> threads: %s",
> name());
> }
>
> yes, we exclude the check for a non-java thread, which I thought was an odd
> exclusion last time I looked. I pass the tests in
> sun/tools/jmap/BasicJMapTest.java so maybe leave it for now?
I agree, maybe a new issue could be created for tracking this.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5681
