On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 22:51:37 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Is the suggestion to have a default parameter to free CHEAP structures 
>> that's false for deallocate_contents?
>> I'm not really sure it's an improvement because I have to have an extra 
>> parameter to Klass::release_C_heap_structures that's unused.
>
> That is one option but I was thinking perhaps remove 
> `constants()->release_C_heap_structures()` from 
> `instanceKlass::release_C_heap_structures()` and have the callers that should 
> remove the CP call `ik->constants()->release_C_heap_structures()` directly?
> Or perhaps just change this comment:
> 
> 
>  // Release C heap allocated data that this points to, which includes
>   // reference counting symbol names.
>   release_C_heap_structures_internal();
> 
> 
> to 
> 
> ` // reference counting symbol names, but excludes the constant pool.`

Yes, I think that combining release_C_heap_structures and 
release_C_heap_structures_internal into single release_C_heap_structures with a 
default parameter will simplify code a little bit. But I'm not sure it is that 
important and would leave it for you to decide. :)

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6105

Reply via email to