> jdb has 3 types of arguments:
> 
> 1. Those that are jdb specific, such as -attach, -launch, and -listconnectors
> 2. Those that are passed to the JVM used to run jdb. These are all prefixed 
> with -J, and any valid JVM argument can be passed in this manner.
> 3. Those that are passed to the debuggee JVM when it is launched, such as 
> -classpath, -D<property>, and any option that starts with -X (including -XX)
> 
> The problem with the 3rd group is that (other than for -D and -X), jdb will 
> only pass through arguments that it recognizes, and that list is very 
> limited. When you want to launch the debuggee with an argument that jdb 
> doesn't recognize, you have no choice but to launch the debuggee yourself 
> (using a separate command line and using the -agentlib:jdwp argument) and 
> then tell jdb to attach to the debuggee process. It's much easier when you 
> can just let jdb launch the debuggee, and our nsk/jdb testing currently 
> relies on this feature.
> 
> This PR adds --enable-preview and --add-modules to the list of arguments that 
> jdb recognizes and passes through to the debuggee JVM. These seem to be the 
> two most glaring omissions, and are two that will likely be needed soon in 
> order for loom nsk/jdb testing to work properly.

Chris Plummer has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional 
commits since the last revision:

 - Re-add copyright change.
 - Remove copyright change.
 - Support -R instead of --enable-preview and --add-modules.

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7708/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7708/files/5ce3a7fc..8edb6986

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=7708&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=7708&range=00-01

  Stats: 37 lines in 5 files changed: 19 ins; 14 del; 4 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7708.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7708/head:pull/7708

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7708

Reply via email to