serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• RFR: 8385628: Typo in jdk.attach comments Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8385628: Typo in jdk.attach comments Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8385628: Typo in jdk.attach comments Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8385628: Typo in jdk.attach comments Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8385627: Typo in JMXServiceURL.java: misssing Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8385627: Typo in JMXServiceURL.java: misssing Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8385627: Typo in JMXServiceURL.java: misssing Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8385627: Typo in JMXServiceURL.java: misssing Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8385627: Typo in JMXServiceURL.java: misssing Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v45] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v45] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v45] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v45] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v45] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v45] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v45] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v45] Roberto Castañeda Lozano
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v44] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v44] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v44] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v44] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v44] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v44] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v44] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v44] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v43] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v43] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v43] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v43] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v43] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v43] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v43] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v43] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v43] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8380448: Split VM_Version::get_processor_features() in vm_version_x86.cpp into multiple helper routines Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8380448: Split VM_Version::get_processor_features() in vm_version_x86.cpp into multiple helper routines Ashutosh Mehra
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v42] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v42] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v42] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v42] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v42] Jatin Bhateja
• Integrated: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping Serguei Spitsyn
• Integrated: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Ashay Rane
• RFR: 8384869: C2: IR Verification Test failures on x86_64 after JDK-8383881 Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8384869: C2: IR Verification Test failures on x86_64 after JDK-8383881 Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8384869: C2: IR Verification Test failures on x86_64 after JDK-8383881 Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8384869: C2: IR Verification Test failures on x86_64 after JDK-8383881 Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8384869: C2: IR Verification Test failures on x86_64 after JDK-8383881 Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8384869: C2: IR Verification Test failures on x86_64 after JDK-8383881 Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8384869: C2: IR Verification Test failures on x86_64 after JDK-8383881 Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8384869: C2: IR Verification Test failures on x86_64 after JDK-8383881 Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8384869: C2: IR Verification Test failures on x86_64 after JDK-8383881 Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8384869: C2: IR Verification Test failures on x86_64 after JDK-8383881 Ashutosh Mehra
  • Integrated: 8384869: C2: IR Verification Test failures on x86_64 after JDK-8383881 Ashutosh Mehra
• RFR: 8376621: Should not suspend thread in start_transition if _is_disable_suspend set Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8376621: Should not suspend thread in start_transition if _is_disable_suspend set David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376621: Should not suspend thread in start_transition if _is_disable_suspend set [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8376621: Should not suspend thread in start_transition if _is_disable_suspend set [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8376621: Should not suspend thread in start_transition if _is_disable_suspend set [v2] David Holmes
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8375076: two JDI scenario tests are failing with out of wait time after completing successfully Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8375076: Two JDI scenario tests are failing with out of wait time after completing successfully David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8375076: Two JDI scenario tests are failing with out of wait time after completing successfully [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8375076: Two JDI scenario tests are failing with out of wait time after completing successfully [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8375076: Two JDI scenario tests are failing with out of wait time after completing successfully [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8375076: Two JDI scenario tests are failing with out of wait time after completing successfully [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
• RFR: 8375062: vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/exclude/exclude001/exclude001.java fails to output debuggee prompt after cont cmd Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8375062: vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/exclude/exclude001/exclude001.java fails to output debuggee prompt after cont cmd David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8375062: vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/exclude/exclude001/exclude001.java fails to output debuggee prompt after cont cmd Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8375062: vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/exclude/exclude001/exclude001.java fails to output debuggee prompt after cont cmd Serguei Spitsyn
• RFR: 8385345: AWT and ImageIO shell tests fail when run using MSys/MinGW Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385345: AWT and ImageIO shell tests fail when run using MSys/MinGW Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8385345: AWT and ImageIO shell tests fail when run using MSys/MinGW Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385345: AWT and ImageIO shell tests fail when run using MSys/MinGW Phil Race
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v32] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v32] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v32] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v32] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v32] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v32] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v32] Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v6] Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v6] Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v6] Thomas Stuefe
• RFR: 8384958: Regression of jvmti/init/GetAllStackTraces/getallstktr001.java caused by JDK-8382273 Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8384958: Regression of jvmti/init/GetAllStackTraces/getallstktr001.java caused by JDK-8382273 Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8384958: Regression of jvmti/init/GetAllStackTraces/getallstktr001.java caused by JDK-8382273 Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8384958: Regression of jvmti/init/GetAllStackTraces/getallstktr001.java caused by JDK-8382273 duke
  • Integrated: 8384958: Regression of jvmti/init/GetAllStackTraces/getallstktr001.java caused by JDK-8382273 Shiv Shah
• Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v5] Robert Toyonaga
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v31] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v31] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v31] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v31] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v32] Serguei Spitsyn
• RFR: 8385165: [ubsan] TestDockerMemoryMetricsSubgroup.java jtreg test fails with ubsan-enabled binaries Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8385165: [ubsan] TestDockerMemoryMetricsSubgroup.java jtreg test fails with ubsan-enabled binaries Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8385165: [ubsan] TestDockerMemoryMetricsSubgroup.java jtreg test fails with ubsan-enabled binaries Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8385165: [ubsan] TestDockerMemoryMetricsSubgroup.java jtreg test fails with ubsan-enabled binaries Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8385165: [ubsan] TestDockerMemoryMetricsSubgroup.java jtreg test fails with ubsan-enabled binaries Matthias Baesken
• Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v4] Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v4] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v4] Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v4] Robert Toyonaga
• Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v3] Robert Toyonaga
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v30] Serguei Spitsyn
• RFR: 8385136: SA cannot unwind the native frame which does not have DWARF Yasumasa Suenaga
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v40] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v29] Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v2] Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v2] Robert Toyonaga
• RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Coleen Phillimore
• RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
• RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows duke
  • Integrated: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Ashay Rane
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v39] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v28] Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v38] Jatin Bhateja
• Integrated: 8317124: use reproducible random in HotSpot tests Shiv Shah
• Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Mat Carter
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows duke
• RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Daniel Fuchs

• Earlier messages