serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8310340: assert(_thread->is_interp_only_mode() || stub_caller) failed: expected a stub-caller Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8310340: assert(_thread->is_interp_only_mode() || stub_caller) failed: expected a stub-caller Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8310340: assert(_thread->is_interp_only_mode() || stub_caller) failed: expected a stub-caller Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8310340: assert(_thread->is_interp_only_mode() || stub_caller) failed: expected a stub-caller Patricio Chilano Mateo
• Withdrawn: 8336691: Test LongArgTest.java intermittent fails java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: jdk/test/lib/Utils duke
• RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v5] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v5] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v5] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v5] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v5] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v6] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v6] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v6] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v6] David Holmes
  • Integrated: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros Coleen Phillimore
• RFR: 8346985: Convert test/jdk/com/sun/jdi/ClassUnloadEventTest.java to Class-File API Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8346985: Convert test/jdk/com/sun/jdi/ClassUnloadEventTest.java to Class-File API Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8346985: Convert test/jdk/com/sun/jdi/ClassUnloadEventTest.java to Class-File API [v2] Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8346985: Convert test/jdk/com/sun/jdi/ClassUnloadEventTest.java to Class-File API [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8346985: Convert test/jdk/com/sun/jdi/ClassUnloadEventTest.java to Class-File API [v2] Adam Sotona
  • Integrated: 8346985: Convert test/jdk/com/sun/jdi/ClassUnloadEventTest.java to Class-File API Adam Sotona
• RFR: 8342996: Enhance Attach API to support arbitrary length arguments - OSX Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8342996: Enhance Attach API to support arbitrary length arguments - OSX Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8342996: Enhance Attach API to support arbitrary length arguments - OSX Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8342996: Enhance Attach API to support arbitrary length arguments - OSX Alex Menkov
  • Integrated: 8342996: Enhance Attach API to support arbitrary length arguments - OSX Alex Menkov
• Alternative to sadebugd Yasumasa Suenaga
  • RE: [External] : Alternative to sadebugd Kevin Walls
  • Re: [External] : Alternative to sadebugd Yasumasa Suenaga
• Why does jstack not trigger a warning in target JVM >= 21? Aman Sharma
  • Re: Why does jstack not trigger a warning in target JVM >= 21? Bernd
  • Re: Why does jstack not trigger a warning in target JVM >= 21? Alan Bateman
  • Re: Why does jstack not trigger a warning in target JVM >= 21? Aman Sharma
• Withdrawn: 8204681: Option to include timestamp in hprof filename duke
• RFR: 8346829: Problem list com/sun/jdi/ReattachStressTest.java & ProcessAttachTest.java on Linux Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8346829: Problem list com/sun/jdi/ReattachStressTest.java & ProcessAttachTest.java on Linux Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8346829: Problem list com/sun/jdi/ReattachStressTest.java & ProcessAttachTest.java on Linux Leonid Mesnik
  • Integrated: 8346829: Problem list com/sun/jdi/ReattachStressTest.java & ProcessAttachTest.java on Linux Phil Race
• RFR: 8346717: serviceability/dcmd/vm/SystemDumpMapTest.java failing on Windows with "Stack base not yet set for thread id" Simon Tooke
  • Re: RFR: 8346717: serviceability/dcmd/vm/SystemDumpMapTest.java failing on Windows with "Stack base not yet set for thread id" Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8346717: serviceability/dcmd/vm/SystemDumpMapTest.java failing on Windows with "Stack base not yet set for thread id" [v2] Simon Tooke
  • Re: RFR: 8346717: serviceability/dcmd/vm/SystemDumpMapTest.java failing on Windows with "Stack base not yet set for thread id" [v2] Simon Tooke
  • Re: RFR: 8346717: serviceability/dcmd/vm/SystemDumpMapTest.java failing on Windows with "Stack base not yet set for thread id" [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8346717: serviceability/dcmd/vm/SystemDumpMapTest.java failing on Windows with "Stack base not yet set for thread id" [v3] Simon Tooke
  • Re: RFR: 8346717: serviceability/dcmd/vm/SystemDumpMapTest.java failing on Windows with "Stack base not yet set for thread id" [v4] Simon Tooke
  • Re: RFR: 8346717: serviceability/dcmd/vm/SystemDumpMapTest.java failing on Windows with "Stack base not yet set for thread id" [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8346717: serviceability/dcmd/vm/SystemDumpMapTest.java failing on Windows with "Stack base not yet set for thread id" [v4] Simon Tooke
  • Re: RFR: 8346717: serviceability/dcmd/vm/SystemDumpMapTest.java failing on Windows with "Stack base not yet set for thread id" [v5] Simon Tooke
  • Re: RFR: 8346717: serviceability/dcmd/vm/SystemDumpMapTest.java failing on Windows with "Stack base not yet set for thread id" [v5] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8346717: serviceability/dcmd/vm/SystemDumpMapTest.java failing on Windows with "Stack base not yet set for thread id" [v5] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8346717: serviceability/dcmd/vm/SystemDumpMapTest.java failing on Windows with "Stack base not yet set for thread id" [v5] duke
  • Integrated: 8346717: serviceability/dcmd/vm/SystemDumpMapTest.java failing on Windows with "Stack base not yet set for thread id" Simon Tooke
• RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files Qizheng Xing
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2] Qizheng Xing
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2] Qizheng Xing
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v3] Qizheng Xing
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2] Qizheng Xing
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2] Qizheng Xing
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2] Qizheng Xing
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2] Qizheng Xing
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v3] Qizheng Xing
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v3] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in some misc files [v3] Qizheng Xing
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in some misc files [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in some misc files [v3] Qizheng Xing
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in some misc files [v3] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in some misc files [v3] David Holmes
  • Integrated: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in some misc files Qizheng Xing
• [jdk24] RFR: 8338714: vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/kill/kill001/kill001.java fails with JTREG_TEST_THREAD_FACTORY=Virtual SendaoYan
  • Re: [jdk24] RFR: 8338714: vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/kill/kill001/kill001.java fails with JTREG_TEST_THREAD_FACTORY=Virtual David Holmes
  • [jdk24] Integrated: 8338714: vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/kill/kill001/kill001.java fails with JTREG_TEST_THREAD_FACTORY=Virtual SendaoYan
  • Re: [jdk24] RFR: 8338714: vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/kill/kill001/kill001.java fails with JTREG_TEST_THREAD_FACTORY=Virtual SendaoYan
• RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v2] Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v2] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v5] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v5] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v5] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v5] Amit Kumar
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v5] Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v5] Amit Kumar
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v5] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v5] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v6] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v8] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v9] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v9] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v9] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v9] Amit Kumar
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v10] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v11] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v11] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v11] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v11] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v11] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v11] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v12] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v12] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v12] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v12] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v13] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v13] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v13] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v13] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v13] Yudi Zheng
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v13] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v13] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v13] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v13] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata [v13] Coleen Phillimore
  • Integrated: 8339113: AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata Coleen Phillimore
• RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v4] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE [v6] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8346460: NotifyFramePop should return JVMTI_ERROR_DUPLICATE Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8336881: [Linux] Support for hierarchical limits for Metrics [v14] Severin Gehwolf
• RFR: 8346383: Cannot use DllMain in libdt_socket for static builds Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8346383: Cannot use DllMain in libdt_socket for static builds Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8346383: Cannot use DllMain in libdt_socket for static builds Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8346383: Cannot use DllMain in libdt_socket for static builds Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8346383: Cannot use DllMain in libdt_socket for static builds David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8346383: Cannot use DllMain in libdt_socket for static builds Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8346383: Cannot use DllMain in libdt_socket for static builds [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8346383: Cannot use DllMain in libdt_socket for static builds [v2] David Holmes
  • Integrated: 8346383: Cannot use DllMain in libdt_socket for static builds Magnus Ihse Bursie

• Earlier messages
• Later messages