On Thu, 4 May 2023 09:52:25 GMT, Thomas Schatzl <tscha...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Is it possible to remove the G1 hack in this change too? Because since now a 
> zero value is supported in the output, there does not seem to be a reason to 
> keep it for G1.

I prefer if that is done and tested as a separate PR.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13796#issuecomment-1534616901

Reply via email to