On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:47:42 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <cole...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> This change makes WeakHandle and OopHandle release null out the obj pointer, 
> at the cost of making the release function non-const and some changes that 
> propagated from that.  This enables ObjectMonitor code to test for null to 
> see if the obj was already released, and seems like the right thing to do.  
> See comments from related PR in the bug report.
> Tested with tier1-4.

This change doesn't fix the problem that you had observed with PR #13721.  (I 
agree with the comments in that PR). It's a general cleanup where after calling 
release() the ObjectMonitor code wants some way to know that it has done so, 
without adding a specific call to WeakHandle::set_null() to do what the callers 
expect release() to do.
I don't really like making the callers non-const, but I like having a special 
set_null() API less.
Even with object -> OM mapping, the OM will still need to weakly point to the 
object, unless the design is changed a lot in the last couple of weeks.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15920#issuecomment-1735587388

Reply via email to