On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 22:33:49 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <sspit...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please, review this fix correcting the JVMTI  `RawMonitorWait()` 
>> implementation.
>> The `RawMonitorWait()` is using the the  `jt->is_interrupted(true)` to 
>> update the interrupt status of the interrupted waiting thread.  The issue is 
>> that when it calls `jt->is_interrupted(true)` to fetch and clear the 
>> `interrupt status` of the virtual thread, this information is not propagated 
>> to the `java.lang.Thread` instance.
>> In the `VirtualThread` class implementation the `interrupt status` for 
>> virtual thread is stored for both virtual and carrier threads. It is because 
>> the implementation of object monitors for virtual threads is based on 
>> pinning virtual threads, and so, always operates on carrier thread. The fix 
>> is to clear the interrupt status for both virtual and carrier  
>> `java.lang.Thread` instances.
>> 
>> Testing:
>>  - tested with new test 
>> `hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/vthread/InterruptRawMonitor` which is 
>> passed with the fix and failed without it
>>  - ran mach5 tiers 1-6
>
> Serguei Spitsyn has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   review: made current changes limitedto just RawMonitorWait

src/hotspot/share/runtime/javaThread.cpp line 596:

> 594: // Checks and clears the interrupt status for platform or virtual thread.
> 595: // Used by the JVMTI RawMonitorWait only.
> 596: bool JavaThread::is_interrupted() {

Reading code that uses JavaThread::is_interrupted() won't be clear that it 
resets the interrupt status. Can this be something that 
get_and_clear_interrupted or something that makes it clearer?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18093#discussion_r1527652412

Reply via email to