Just to state: if the majority wants a rename , that is of course fine. The existing name is admittedly a bit of an eyesore.
On Thu 8. Aug 2024 at 13:33, Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stu...@gmail.com> wrote: > I like it short, succinct and greppable. > > NMTCategory? NMTCat? > > That said, I can live with the current name and dread the cv backporting > and support implications of this change. > > On Thu 8. Aug 2024 at 10:50, Gerard Ziemski <gziem...@openjdk.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 04:47:18 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> >> wrote: >> >> > If you called it `MemTypeFlag` - which to me still suggests >> mutually-exclusive values - then you would not need to rename all the >> variables with "flag" in their name later. >> >> Hmm, not a bad idea. Are there any other opinions? >> >> ------------- >> >> PR Comment: >> https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20497#issuecomment-2276354395 >> >
