On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 06:11:26 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Sequence number, nouce, anything will work here as it's just to deal with >> the scenario where the timeout task for a previous wait may run concurrently >> with a subsequent wait. > > Suggestion: `timedWaitCounter` ? We could rename it to timedWaitSeqNo if needed. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21565#discussion_r1812537648
