On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 12:46:29 GMT, Matthias Baesken <mbaes...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> We were running into this error : >> sun/tools/jhsdb/HeapDumpTestWithActiveProcess.java on Linux aarch64, jdk25 >> >> stderr: [java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to deduce type of thread from >> address 0x0000ffff34144e30 (expected type JavaThread, CompilerThread, >> MonitorDeflationThread, AttachListenerThread, StringDedupThread, >> NotificationThread, ServiceThread or JvmtiAgentThread) >> at >> jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.Threads.createJavaThreadWrapper(Threads.java:196) >> at >> jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.Threads.getJavaThreadAt(Threads.java:178) >> at >> jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.utilities.HeapHprofBinWriter.dumpStackTraces(HeapHprofBinWriter.java:828) >> at >> jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.utilities.HeapHprofBinWriter.write(HeapHprofBinWriter.java:460) >> at >> jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.JMap.writeHeapHprofBin(JMap.java:216) >> at jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.JMap.run(JMap.java:103) >> at jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.Tool.startInternal(Tool.java:278) >> at jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.Tool.start(Tool.java:241) >> at jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.Tool.execute(Tool.java:134) >> at jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.JMap.main(JMap.java:202) >> at jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.SALauncher.runJMAP(SALauncher.java:344) >> at jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.SALauncher.main(SALauncher.java:507) >> Caused by: sun.jvm.hotspot.types.WrongTypeException: No suitable match for >> type of address 0x0000ffff34144e30 >> at >> jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.InstanceConstructor.newWrongTypeException(InstanceConstructor.java:62) >> at >> jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.VirtualConstructor.instantiateWrapperFor(VirtualConstructor.java:80) >> at >> jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.Threads.createJavaThreadWrapper(Threads.java:192) >> ... 11 more >> >> In the discussion in the JBS bug it was found that a retry option in` launch >> `should be added. > > Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > add comments Marked as reviewed by kevinw (Reviewer). ------------- PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23213#pullrequestreview-2582033507
