On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 02:31:29 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Absence of benchmarking and given the relatively small footprint savings, I > don't think we should switch to SIZE. LTO seems fine. I don't know of any > negative impacts with using it. @TheShermanTanker , @magicus what do you think ? Should we additionally offer LTO on library level ? See https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/make/common/native/Flags.gmk#L43 Currently we only have it as an additional option for libjvm and not the other native libs . > I think you can optionally configure libjvm.so to be built for small size, > not performance Yes true for libjvm this is possible, it is the opt-size part of the minimal features set `JVM_FEATURES_minimal='compiler1 minimal opt-size serialgc'` ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23563#issuecomment-2681231574 PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23563#issuecomment-2681239626
