On Wed, 7 May 2025 02:24:00 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> A followup to [JDK-8355773](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8355773). >> Convert a bunch more tests to fetch the ThreadReference from a static field >> in the debuggee. [JDK-8355773](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8355773) >> focused on the easier tests that already had a static field, and the name of >> the field was the same as the thread name. This batch takes care of a bunch >> of harder to convert tests where in many cases static field has to be added >> and usually does not have the same name as the thread name. >> >> Note there was a lot of template copy-n-paste code that I deleted because it >> was never used. For example, most tests were not using the `listIterator` >> variable. There were also many deletions of calls to vm.allThreads(). Some >> were because the need to iterate over the threads went away, but most were >> because the result was never used. >> >> There are many places where the original code iterated over all the threads >> looking for a particular thread rather than calling on of the existing >> threadByName() APIs, and you'll see this being replaced by calls to the new >> threadByFieldNameOrThrow() API. One thing to keep in mind is that the old >> code tried to continue running the test if it failed to find the thread. >> This would lead to a timeout. threadByFieldNameOrThrow() will throw an >> exception which forces the test to quickly exit. >> >> I added a 2nd threadByFieldNameOrThrow() API. The original one just took a >> threadFieldName argument, assuming that the name of the static field and the >> name of the thread were the same. The new one adds a threadName argument, >> allowing for the two to be different. The threadName is used just to double >> check that the Thread fetched from the static field has the expected name. >> It is not used as part of the lookup. >> >> Tested with CI tier5, which is where all the nsk/jdi testing is done. Also >> ran locally on linux-x64. > > Chris Plummer has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > undo copyright change Thank you for the reviews Alex, Serguei, and Leonid. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24979#issuecomment-2863820341
