On Fri, 9 May 2025 08:40:44 GMT, Leo Korinth <lkori...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> The whole idea of running with a timeout factor of `0.7` is to remove > intermittent failures. (I had it close to 0.5 or maybe less to begin with > until I found and reported CODETOOLS-7903937: JTREG uses timeout factor on > socket timeout but not on KEEPALIVE) Yes - I understand. My point is that there are probably more tests that will need an extended timeout than those that you have already modified. And we want to find out which before the actual change from 4 to 1.0. IMO if a test fails intermittently with 0.7, it's a good indication that it might continue failling intermittently with 1.0, and therefore it should be updated in this PR too. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25122#issuecomment-2865849069