On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 18:01:26 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> The nsk BindServer class is no longer used so it can be removed. This appears 
> to be a remnant left over after the following recent change:
> 
> [JDK-8333117](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333117) Remove support of 
> remote and manual debuggee launchers
> 
> There is also some additional cleanup of "manual" and "remote" debuggee 
> launchers done by this PR and fixing some comments that have been wrong for a 
> long time regarding "see also".
> 
> Tested by running nsk/jdi, nsk/jdb, and nsk/jdwp tests locally. I'll also run 
> them with tier5 CI once reviews have been done.

test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/jdb/Launcher.java line 35:

> 33: /**
> 34:  * This class provides launching of <code>jdb</code> and debuggee in local
> 35:  * mode according to test command line options.

As now there is only local mode, I think there is no sense to mention it at all:

 * This class provides launching of <code>jdb</code> and debuggee
 * according to test command line options.

test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/jdb/Launcher.java line 97:

> 95: 
> 96:     /**
> 97:      * Defines mode (local) and type of connector (default, launching,

Suggestion:

     * Defines type of connector (default, launching,

test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/jpda/DebugeeProcess.java line 44:

> 42:  * debugee VM process.
> 43:  * Derived classes should implement these methods corresponding to the 
> mode
> 44:  * that the process should be started in (locally).

I think this can be dropped

test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/jpda/IOPipe.java line 32:

> 30:  * This class implements communicational channel between
> 31:  * debugger and debugee used for synchronization and data exchange.
> 32:  * This channel is based on TCP/IP socketss.

Suggestion:

 * This channel is based on TCP/IP sockets.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25785#discussion_r2146271592
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25785#discussion_r2146272505
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25785#discussion_r2146275444
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25785#discussion_r2146276315

Reply via email to