On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:15:21 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Chris, please, let me know if it is okay to keep this at is or you still >> want an update for the `NotifyFramePop`. > > I understand what you are saying about the comparison to SetBreakpoint and > that SetFramePop would have been a better name, but I don't see what this > with the description. I said "set a FramePop event" doesn't sound right. > Neither would "set a Breakpoint event". Also, the analogy with breakpoints > doesn't really work when you consider that "a breakpoint" is meaningful, but > "a FrampPop" does not. > > A breakpoint is a location in the code where a breakpoint event will be > triggered when executed. That analogy doesn't really work with FramePop. We > don't have a word similar to breakpoint that means "a frame marked for > generating a FramePop event when popped". Okay, thanks. I've updated the `NotifyFramePop` spec as you suggested: ```A FramePop event cannot be generated for this frame``` ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26111#discussion_r2196933575
