On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 16:35:11 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo <pchilanom...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> But maybe we could also add a has_async_exception_condition() check to > bailout. Yes. BTW I don't think this is in any way new. I think Thread.stop would have had the same issue. Issuing the internal interrupt was just a convenient way to unblock all the interruptible blocking points - and as Alan notes, monitor acquisition is not interruptible. We likely did not care that this could make the interrupt state appear odd if the thread continued after the async (ThreadDeath) exception. Not sure it is really that different for the debugger - if we have stopped the thread (not just suspended it) then we shouldn't really be expecting it to continue as normal afterwards. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26365#issuecomment-3085431826
