On Sat, 9 Aug 2025 19:50:14 GMT, Philippe Marschall <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Reduce the usage of JNI in the Linux attach provider by making more use of 
> the `Path` API.
> 
> - use the `Path` API to read file permissions
> - use the `Path` API  to write to and read from Unix domain sockets
> - use JDK internal APIs to access the euid and eguid
> 
> After this the sole usage of JNI in the Linux attach provider will be to send 
> a signal using `kill`.
> 
> I ran the tier1 and serviceability test suites and they both pass. I verified 
> I can attach to and attach using a locally built JDK. I didn't do any Docker 
> related tests.
> 
> I split the changes into two commits:
> 
> - The first commit ports the permission check code more or less directly from 
> C to Java using integer based checks.
> - The second commit changes the permission check code to use higher level 
> Java abstractions (`UserPrincipal`, `Set`, ...)
> 
> I hope this makes it easier to review and verify the changes preserve the 
> semantics.
> 
> To the best of my knowledge `uid_t` is an unsigned 32 bit integer. 
> `VM#geteuid()` returns it as `long`, unsigned. However 
> `UnixUserPrincipals#fromUid` expects an `int`, I believe casting is the 
> correct way to convert in this case.
> 
> I tried to keep unrelated changes to `VirtualMachineImpl` to a minimum. I did 
> however replace all usages of `java.io.File` with `java.nio.file.Path` and 
> made two methods `static`. We could get rid of the `socket_path` instance 
> variable if we instead use `socket_address` to flag a disconnect.
> 
> Ultimately the same changes can be applied to the macOS an AIX 
> implementations.

Thanks for the work so far, nice to get rid of JNI. :slightly_smiling_face: 

There is a [problemlisted test](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21417) 
related to this that could make sense to run manually 
(https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341518, it's failing in Oracle's CI but I 
have not been able to reproduce the failure myself, discussed a bit in 
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21331 too).

I'll see if I can find time to check out this change locally and run some 
tests, otherwise, feel free to run it yourself.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26712#issuecomment-3173574572

Reply via email to