On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 14:07:51 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <cole...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Evgeny Astigeevich has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Symplify comments; Get JavaThread::current in variable
>
> Okay I ran the test case in the issue and I see why it wouldn't be reliable.  
> I verified it with the new more minimalistic patch here: 
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/26971

@coleenp,

I have pulled your changes.
I added a `guarantee` check to `copy_bytecodes`. IMO it's better to be 
overcautious to prevent incorrect uses of `copy_bytes`.  Because of it I had to 
add `link_class` to `GetBytecodes`.

I don't use the macros because they rely on `THREAD`.  It is a variable in your 
patch but it is usually used as a macro.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26863#issuecomment-3238571537

Reply via email to