On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 11:19:14 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Even calling it "lightweight locking" is no longer needed.
>
> I think the name "lightweight locking" is used for the file name and class 
> name, so the name is okay.  It does help if you're trying to understand the 
> history of the locking algorithm.

Fixed

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27041#discussion_r2322050243

Reply via email to