On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 07:38:03 GMT, David Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:
> > So I am not sure if we really have that separation anymore. > > I think it is more that there are many bits of code that actually form the > "boundary" (prims, services, some runtime, jvmci, interpreter-related). But I > guess it is hard to argue this makes it markedly worse. Arguably the translation of Java mirrors to Klasses is also a boundary (from Java representation to VM representation) :-) In reality I think because jobjects are easy to use and are just another kind of handle (like Handle and OopHandle), the leakage from JNI code to other parts of VM just happened naturally. > > The code already assumes that it has an InstanceKlass, and I am not > > changing that. > > Okay. BTW I removed the JVMTI changes from this PR. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27158#issuecomment-3272437346
