On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:55:16 GMT, Matthias Baesken <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Is there is a particular reason to not apply this on x64 as well? > > On macOS x86_64 I saw in our CI those tests failing when enabling the > dead_strip feature serviceability/sa/ClhsdbCDSCore.java > serviceability/sa/ClhsdbFindPC.jav serviceability/sa/ClhsdbPstack.java That information should at least be stated in the bug for future reference on why this decision was made. > For macOS aarch64, the tests in our CI were fine but I see some failures in > the GHA in the serviceability area. > > ``` > finding class loader instances ..java.lang.InternalError: Metadata does not > appear to be polymorphic > at > jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.types.basic.BasicTypeDataBase.findDynamicTypeForAddress(BasicTypeDataBase.java:223) > at > jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.VirtualBaseConstructor.instantiateWrapperFor(VirtualBaseConstructor.java:104) > at > jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.oops.Metadata.instantiateWrapperFor(Metadata.java:78) > at > jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.memory.SystemDictionary.getClassLoaderKlass(SystemDictionary.java:102) > at > jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.ClassLoaderStats.printClassLoaderStatistics(ClassLoaderStats.java:93) > at > jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.ClassLoaderStats.run(ClassLoaderStats.java:78) > at jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.JMap.run(JMap.java:121) > at > jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.Tool.startInternal(Tool.java:278) > at jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.Tool.start(Tool.java:241) > at jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.Tool.execute(Tool.java:134) > at jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.JMap.main(JMap.java:202) > at > jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.SALauncher.runJMAP(SALauncher.java:344) > at > jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.SALauncher.main(SALauncher.java:507) > ``` Adding serviceability label as this is affecting their tests. I have a vague memory of some seemingly dead code being necessary for certain sa functionality. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28319#issuecomment-3547789577
