On Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:04:51 GMT, Anton Artemov <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Hi, please consider the following changes:
>> 
>> If suspension is allowed when a thread is re-entering an object monitor 
>> (OM), then a deadlock is possible:
>> 
>> The waiting thread is made to be a successor and is unparked. Upon a 
>> suspension request, the thread will suspend itself whilst clearing the 
>> successor. The OM will be left unlocked (not grabbed by any thread), while 
>> the other threads are parked until a thread grabs the OM and the exits it. 
>> The suspended thread is on the entry-list and can be selected as a successor 
>> again. None of other threads can be woken up to grab the OM until the 
>> suspended thread has been resumed and successfully releases the OM.
>> 
>> This can happen in two places where the successor could be suspended: 
>> 1:
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/6322aaba63b235cb6c73d23a932210af318404ec/src/hotspot/share/runtime/objectMonitor.cpp#L1897
>> 
>> 2:
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/6322aaba63b235cb6c73d23a932210af318404ec/src/hotspot/share/runtime/objectMonitor.cpp#L1149
>> 
>> The issues are addressed by not allowing suspension in case 1, and by 
>> handling the suspension request at a later stage, after the thread has 
>> grabbed the OM in `reenter_internal()` in case 2. In case of a suspension 
>> request, the thread exits the OM and enters it again once resumed. 
>> 
>> The JVMTI `waited` event posting (2nd one) is postponed until the suspended 
>> thread is resumed and has entered the OM again.  The `enter` to the OM (in 
>> case `ExitOnSuspend` did exit) is done without posting any events.
>> 
>> Tests are added for both scenarios. 
>> 
>> Tested in tiers 1 - 7.
>
> Anton Artemov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   8366659: Refactored tests.

Changes requested by lmesnik (Reviewer).

test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/SuspendWithObjectMonitorWait/SuspendWithObjectMonitorWaitWorker.java
 line 42:

> 40: 
> 41:     public void run() {
> 42:         SuspendWithObjectMonitorWait1.logDebug("thread running");

SuspendWithObjectMonitorWaitBase instead of SuspendWithObjectMonitorWait1 here.
There are a lot such places in this file.

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27040#pullrequestreview-3484952328
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27040#discussion_r2543738637

Reply via email to