On Wed, 19 Nov 2025 22:55:34 GMT, Leonid Mesnik <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Anton Artemov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   8366659: Refactored tests.
>
> Changes requested by lmesnik (Reviewer).

> @lmesnik are the JVMTI thread state transitions performed in the event 
> posting code? If so the different order, and thus different states, would be 
> a concern.

Yes, JVMTI event posting code performs thread state transitions. But I was 
talking about the JVMTI thread state bits specified here: 
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/25/docs/specs/jvmti.html#GetThreadState

> That said we have noticed that only the timeout case seems to operate in a 
> way that the monitor reentry can post contended_enter and contended_entered 
> events, which seems very odd in itself.

Right. We have this oddity.

> Though I will also note that the way the suspension code drops and then 
> re-acquires the monitor, any contended_enter* events could get posted 
> multiple times which would also be surprising.

Right. There have to be some ways to fix it. Most likely we already have a bug 
against this issue.


> Maintaining the event order is problematic as, with the fix to the deadlock 
> issue, we only allow suspension during reentry, and that would mean the 
> monitor_waited event would be posted whilst the thread is still suspended.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27040#issuecomment-3560750605

Reply via email to