On Tue, 10 Mar 2026 04:06:57 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga <[email protected]> wrote:

>> We saw the failure in serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java 
>> on Valhalla repo. `jhsdb jstack --mixed` could not unwind continuation call 
>> frames as following:
>> 
>> 
>>                    * LingeredAppWithVirtualThread.run() bci:15 line:69 
>> (Interpreted frame)
>>                    * java.lang.Thread.runWith(java.lang.Object, 
>> java.lang.Runnable) bci:5 line:1540 (Compiled frame [deoptimized]; 
>> information may be imprecise)
>>                    * java.lang.VirtualThread.run(java.lang.Runnable) bci:62 
>> line:472 (Compiled frame [deoptimized]; information may be imprecise)
>> 0x00007fdad773cf98 <StubRoutines (continuation stubs)>
>> 0xfefefefefefefefe ????????
>> 
>> 
>> I found that `frame::sender_for_compiled_frame()` in frame_x86.inline.hpp 
>> has a special case if sender PC has return barrier entry, but SA does not 
>> handle it.
>> 
>> This is not only a problem on Valhalla. Same problem exists on JDK. So I 
>> want to fix on JDK.
>> This PR passed serviceability/sa tests on Linux, and also 
>> TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java on Valhalla passed 100 times.
>> 
>> This PR is assembled by following commits:
>> 
>> * Follows continuation-related code in HotSpot, and use it on AMD64 SA code
>>     * 
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/30107/changes/4af559ee0dbc0bb61e0bcd91bb17459a5abf50ad
>> * Fix for AArch64
>>     * 
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/30107/changes/2cff0fe40c52b88dd8d79ad1534e73b7b0f88f8d
>> * Fix for RISC-V
>>     * 
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/30107/changes/fdef0384577bb71d34371f11bc5878494f276857
>> * Fix for PPC64
>>     * 
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/30107/changes/5d9774d82c7e8c4d92eae8995ab014232ce9590e
>
> Yasumasa Suenaga has updated the pull request incrementally with two 
> additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Update 
> src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/runtime/amd64/AMD64Frame.java
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Chris Plummer <[email protected]>
>  - Update 
> src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/runtime/amd64/AMD64Frame.java
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Chris Plummer <[email protected]>

PPC64 code looks correct to me. Thanks!

src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/runtime/aarch64/AARCH64ContinuationEntry.java
 line 40:

> 38:     @Override
> 39:     public Frame toFrame() {
> 40:         return new AARCH64Frame(getEntrySP(), getEntrySP(), getEntryFP(), 
> getEntryPC());

Do we need the same code replicated for all platforms? (May make senes. Not 
sure.)

src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/runtime/ppc64/PPC64Frame.java
 line 379:

> 377:       // It is same with c'tor arguments of RegisterMap in 
> frame::next_frame().
> 378:       //
> 379:       // HotSpot code in cpu/riscv/frame_riscv.inline.hpp:

Should better refer to cpu/ppc/frame_ppc.inline.hpp

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30107#pullrequestreview-3990692273
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30107#discussion_r2974106906
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30107#discussion_r2974097400

Reply via email to