On Wed, 27 May 2026 16:20:00 GMT, Paul Sandoz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi @PaulSandoz , As per the following comment fix for JDK-8373574 is >>> included in this patch. [#28002 >>> (comment)](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/28002#issuecomment-3661203155) >>> >>> Patch has been regressed by @XiaohongGong on AARCH64 >> >> Great! would you mind closing down >> [JDK-8373574](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8373574) as duplicate of >> the issue for this PR or update 8373574 to focus on a regression test if one >> is not added to this PR? > >> @PaulSandoz @jatin-bhateja I saw that there is already a PR for the template >> fuzzer, so I'd like to review that one too, so we can integrate the two >> things in close succession. As we have seen with the rest of the Vector API >> before: fuzzing revealed a good number of bugs that our hand-written tests >> did not cover. Integrating tests later means we discover bugs later, and >> that puts more pressure on the compiler team - I'd like to avoid that ;) >> >> #30997 > > Understood. We are getting very close to RDP1, after we still have time to > add more tests but not features. > > @jatin-bhateja is #30997 ready for testing with this PR? @PaulSandoz @jatin-bhateja Is the goal really to push this before RDP1? And the template testing only after? The template fuzzer will take a few weeks to find hits. So then we basically have no time to fix before the release. I don't want to be responsible for those bugs to end up on our compiler bug dashboard. I would prefer if we could just push it after the fork/branch, add the template fuzzer and give it some months to bake, and have enough time to fix follow-up bugs. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28002#issuecomment-4561797065
