On Fri, 29 May 2026 06:29:17 GMT, Emanuel Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
> @jbhateja BTW: the fuzzer is not yet fully ready and reviewed - there are > some design questions over there. > > So I'm worried that if we now integrated this PR here, and took more time for > the fuzzer, the fuzzer would really have very little to no time to find > issues. Hi @eme64, First, thanks for building the template fuzzer — it has consistently proven to be an excellent tool for catching subtle codegen bugs, and we genuinely appreciate the effort you've put into it. That work is highly valued. That said, the fuzzer (#30997) is tracked separately from this PR, and any Float16-related issues it surfaces will be triaged and fixed in exactly the same way we handle fuzzer-found issues for the other lane types today. The in-tree validation in this PR already meets the bar we apply to other Vector API types Best Regards ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28002#issuecomment-4571652427
