On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 18:08:59 GMT, Chris Plummer <[email protected]> wrote:
> One possibility is to get this change pushed now, but without the deadlock > fix. That would require problem listing it, which would also require a new CR > to address the deadlock fix. Or maybe the existing CR should be used for the > deadlock issue, and you can create a new CR for pushing the virtual thread > support sans the deadlock fix, and also have that CR/PR handle problem > listing. No hurry on any of this. We can wait and see how the JVM fix > discussion unfolds. Sounds good. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32267#issuecomment-5268828884
