On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 13:23:39 GMT, Casper Norrbin <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think there is any dependancy on the current (previous) format. The > only JDK reference is the test testing the command, and the command has only > been visible for a very short while. Keeping both formats supported was not > the intention, rather a coincidence since we need internal names when probing > the symbol table. Oh I misread this a bit. Yes here inside the probe method it's internal format. We can get away with swapping / for . specifically in class names I suppose. This command ends up being a bit permissive in what it accepts, in a way that VM.class_hierarchy is not. 8-) ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32396#issuecomment-5329097324
