On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 23:29:11 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Because it is now needed if there is an OpaqueFrameException on a virtual >> thread. If this happens, there is no failure and we continue on to Test 5, >> but the debuggee would still be stuck in the loop in Test 4. > > Right, but I mean the extra sentence that mentions that this is not always > needed is still correct. I want to keep this simple. How about "Make sure the debuggee exits the loop even if the async exception was not thrown". I don't want the debugger side to be presumptuous about what has happened on the debuggee side. Bugs might interfere with expectations. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32403#discussion_r3817668196
