On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 21:22:38 GMT, Fredrik Bredberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This PR is a follow-up to >> [JDK-8389325](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8389325) ("Remove the >> UseObjectMonitorTable flag and related code"). It: >> - Removes obsolete mark-word and monitor-pointer support. >> - Removes displaced-mark related code in garbage collectors (G1, Parallel GC >> and Shenandoah). >> - Renames UseObjectMonitorTableTest to ObjectMonitorTableTest. >> - Addresses all the leftover review comments from >> [JDK-8389325](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8389325). >> >> Passes tier1-5 tests successfully on supported platforms. >> >> --------- >> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the >> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai). > > Fredrik Bredberg has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > Updated after review Looks like an excellent pass 2 clean up! src/hotspot/share/oops/markWord.cpp line 69: > 67: #endif > 68: st->print(" age=%d)", age()); > 69: } This looks like a good rewrite. There was a gtest that tested for this output. Did they pass? test/hotspot/gtest/oops/test_markWord.cpp line 94: > 92: { > 93: ObjectLocker ol(h_obj, THREAD); > 94: assert_mark_word_print_pattern(h_obj, "is_locked"); Yup you fixed it ------------- Marked as reviewed by coleenp (Reviewer). PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32471#pullrequestreview-5017959893 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32471#discussion_r3852174247 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32471#discussion_r3852189033
