On Wed, 26 Aug 2026 05:55:38 GMT, Shiv Shah <[email protected]> wrote:

> The SA sizes a stack chunk like any fixed size instance, the layout helper 
> only covers the header part, so the region walk steps into the copied stack 
> data, fails to parse it as an object and gives up on the rest of the region. 
> whatever lives after the chunk never makes it into the dump, that is what the 
> hprof verification failures were. the fix reads the chunk’s own size field 
> and computes the footprint the same way the vm does, header plus stack plus 
> the gc bitmap words. the heap dump test comes off the virtual problem list 
> since it passes now.
> 
> 
> ---------
> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK 
> Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

Almost looks good, but it seems to be different from HotSpot implementation. I 
think it is better to follow HotSpot manner (including to add methods even if 
it is one-liner) as possible for comparing with HotSpot in maintainance.
For example, `InstanceStackChunkKlass::oop_size()` declares as following:


size_t InstanceStackChunkKlass::oop_size(oop obj) const {
  return instance_size(jdk_internal_vm_StackChunk::size(obj));
}


`instance_size()` is here:


inline size_t InstanceStackChunkKlass::instance_size(size_t 
stack_size_in_words) const {
  return align_object_size(size_helper() + stack_size_in_words + 
gc_data_size(stack_size_in_words));
}

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32525#issuecomment-5487809063

Reply via email to