On Fri, 16 Oct 2026 19:43:46 GMT, Fairoz Matte <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Thanks @AlanBateman and @kevinjwalls for looking into this.
>
> Hi Alan, I prefer to keep the value as it is, -1 instead of 0. Do let me
> know, if that is fine!
History reveals that the hashCode algorithm was imported from Map:
// this is the equivalent of Map.hashCode()
Possibly -1 was a less likely value (an empty `HashMap().hashCode()` produces 0)
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/33368#discussion_r4315138600
