I hope you mean that the <faultstring/> element is present, but empty (this
is what my test show).  I have just checked in a fix for that.

Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

On 5/19/06, Eric Dofonsou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I just send the config file, you can discard it.  This
is working fine now.

I'am still not getting the error messages from the
bus.

The <faultstring/> attribute is missing.



--- Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Could you send you configuration files for the http
> endpoints ?
> I have tried with svn latest head, using a soap
> consumer and a soap
> provider,
> and i have a valid result at the end.
> I have made some changes yesterday on xml stax
> parsing, wondering if it has
> fixed the problem ...
>
> Btw, could you raise a jira for ws-i compliance, we
> need to try the test
> suite.
>
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
> On 5/19/06, Eric Dofonsou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello guys
> >
> > I've got yet another issue with servicemix
> handling of
> > web services, WSDL and soap messages.
> >
> > Here is my config :
> > C#:Stub -> BUS:HTTP Consumer->BUS:HTTP
> > Provider->JBOSS:Web service
> >
> > Using the c# stub, The following query is sent to
> the
> > bus :
> > ------
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> > <soapenv:Envelope
> >
>
xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
> >
>
xmlns:ws="http://ws.location.services.cardinal.com/";>
> >    <soapenv:Body>
> > <listAllProvider
> > xmlns="http://ws.location.services.cardinal.com/";
> >
> >
>
xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
> >   xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
> >
> >
>
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
> > <clientSessionGuid
> >
>
xmlns="">RkZGRiAgICAgICAgICAgIA==</clientSessionGuid>
> > </listAllProvider>
> >    </soapenv:Body>
> > </soapenv:Envelope>
> > ------
> > Notice the definition of an empty name space for
> the
> > clientSessionGuid attribute.  However when the
> message
> > is parsed by the bus the empty namespace attribute
> is
> > lost before being sent to the HTTP provider :
> > -------
> > <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
> > <env:Envelope
> >
>
xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
> > <env:Body>
> > <listAllProvider
> > xmlns="http://ws.location.services.cardinal.com/";
> >
>
xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
> >
> >
>
xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
> >
> >
>
xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
> >
> xmlns:ws="http://ws.location.services.cardinal.com/";
> > xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
> >
> >
>
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
> >
>
<clientSessionGuid>RkZGRiAgICAgICAgICAgIA==</clientSessionGuid>
> > </listAllProvider>
> > </env:Body>
> > </env:Envelope>
> > ----
> > Because of this the call fails ?
> >
> > I was wondering if we can look at a way to make
> the
> > BUS WS-i compliant for web services
> > (http://www.ws-i.org).  this would be a great
> addon
> > for the bus.
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com




--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Reply via email to