Thx I will test it again. --- Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope you mean that the <faultstring/> element is > present, but empty (this > is what my test show). I have just checked in a fix > for that. > > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > On 5/19/06, Eric Dofonsou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > I just send the config file, you can discard it. > This > > is working fine now. > > > > I'am still not getting the error messages from the > > bus. > > > > The <faultstring/> attribute is missing. > > > > > > > > --- Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Could you send you configuration files for the > http > > > endpoints ? > > > I have tried with svn latest head, using a soap > > > consumer and a soap > > > provider, > > > and i have a valid result at the end. > > > I have made some changes yesterday on xml stax > > > parsing, wondering if it has > > > fixed the problem ... > > > > > > Btw, could you raise a jira for ws-i compliance, > we > > > need to try the test > > > suite. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > > > > On 5/19/06, Eric Dofonsou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello guys > > > > > > > > I've got yet another issue with servicemix > > > handling of > > > > web services, WSDL and soap messages. > > > > > > > > Here is my config : > > > > C#:Stub -> BUS:HTTP Consumer->BUS:HTTP > > > > Provider->JBOSS:Web service > > > > > > > > Using the c# stub, The following query is sent > to > > > the > > > > bus : > > > > ------ > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > > > > <soapenv:Envelope > > > > > > > > > > xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; > > > > > > > > > > xmlns:ws="http://ws.location.services.cardinal.com/";> > > > > <soapenv:Body> > > > > <listAllProvider > > > > > xmlns="http://ws.location.services.cardinal.com/"; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; > > > > xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";> > > > > <clientSessionGuid > > > > > > > > > > xmlns="">RkZGRiAgICAgICAgICAgIA==</clientSessionGuid> > > > > </listAllProvider> > > > > </soapenv:Body> > > > > </soapenv:Envelope> > > > > ------ > > > > Notice the definition of an empty name space > for > > > the > > > > clientSessionGuid attribute. However when the > > > message > > > > is parsed by the bus the empty namespace > attribute > > > is > > > > lost before being sent to the HTTP provider : > > > > ------- > > > > <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> > > > > <env:Envelope > > > > > > > > > > xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";> > > > > <env:Body> > > > > <listAllProvider > > > > > xmlns="http://ws.location.services.cardinal.com/"; > > > > > > > > > > xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; > > > > > > > > xmlns:ws="http://ws.location.services.cardinal.com/"; > > > > xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";> > > > > > > > > > > <clientSessionGuid>RkZGRiAgICAgICAgICAgIA==</clientSessionGuid> > > > > </listAllProvider> > > > > </env:Body> > > > > </env:Envelope> > > > > ---- > > > > Because of this the call fails ? > > > > > > > > I was wondering if we can look at a way to > make > > > the > > > > BUS WS-i compliant for web services > > > > (http://www.ws-i.org). this would be a great > > > addon > > > > for the bus. > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > > protection around > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers, > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
