On 6/6/06, william kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,
I am getting a bit perplexed with the concepts of light weight components
and JBI components,static and dynamic loading of components, use of
Servicemix.xml and JBI.xml.
Here is what i understand.
It would be greatly indebted if someone validates this information for me

   1. Light weight components as defined in *
   org.apache.servicemix.components.jms*  can be loaded on the JBI
   container at startup time using servicemix.xml.


True

  2. Light weight components can be added to
servicemix-lwcontainer<
http://servicemix.org/site/servicemix-lwcontainer.html>
,
   at run time,using JBI.xml at run time.


True (but the xml file is also named servicemix.xml)

  3. JBI compliant binding component as defined in *
   org.apache.servicemix.jms* can be loaded at runtime on to the JBI
   container at run time using JBI.xml.


True

  4. JBI compliant binding component can be loaded using
servicemix.xmlstatically at startup.


True

This does  not seem a great comparison as they both have the same features.
One difference is that JBI compliant BC can handle service units, soap,
handle more MEPs and can support WSDL.
But you're right that they can both be used statically in the main
servicemix.xml.

Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Please let me know if i wrong in my understand with some or all of the
points I have mentioned above.
Thanks in advance
William


On 6/5/06, william kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Thanks Guillaume,
> I bumped into
> http://servicemix.org/site/what-is-a-lightweight-component.html article
> which helped.
> Regards,
>  William
>
>
>  On 6/2/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The first one is http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/jms.html
> > and the second one is
> > http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/servicemix-jms.html
> >
> > The main difference is that servicemix-jms is a JBI compliant binding
> > component,
> > whereas the first one is a lightweight component.  I would advise to
use
> > servicemix-jms
> > whic has more features (still lacking JCA support though) and can also
> > be
> > configured
> > in a static servicemix.xml configuration file.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> >
> > On 6/2/06, william kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi.
> > > I find that there are two sets of packages for components in service
> > mix
> > >
> > >    1. org.apache.servicemix.components.jms
> > >    2. org.apache.servicemix.jms
> > >
> > > Can any one tell me the difference? Which is the package that needs
to
> > > used
> > > to configure JMS endpoints and why?
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > William
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to