Thanks Guillaume, On 6/6/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/6/06, william kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > I am getting a bit perplexed with the concepts of light weight components > and JBI components,static and dynamic loading of components, use of > Servicemix.xml and JBI.xml. > Here is what i understand. > It would be greatly indebted if someone validates this information for me > > 1. Light weight components as defined in * > org.apache.servicemix.components.jms* can be loaded on the JBI > container at startup time using servicemix.xml. True 2. Light weight components can be added to > servicemix-lwcontainer< > http://servicemix.org/site/servicemix-lwcontainer.html> > , > at run time,using JBI.xml at run time. True (but the xml file is also named servicemix.xml) 3. JBI compliant binding component as defined in * > org.apache.servicemix.jms* can be loaded at runtime on to the JBI > container at run time using JBI.xml. True 4. JBI compliant binding component can be loaded using > servicemix.xmlstatically at startup. True This does not seem a great comparison as they both have the same features.
Did you mean comparison between the JMS JBI component and JMS light weight
component? One difference is that JBI compliant BC can handle service units, soap,
handle more MEPs and can support WSDL.
But you're right that they can both be used statically in the main
servicemix.xml. Cheers, Guillaume Nodet
Thanks again, William Please let me know if i wrong in my understand with some or all of the
> points I have mentioned above. > Thanks in advance > William > > > On 6/5/06, william kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks Guillaume, > > I bumped into > > http://servicemix.org/site/what-is-a-lightweight-component.htmlarticle > > which helped. > > Regards, > > William > > > > > > On 6/2/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > The first one is http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/jms.html > > > and the second one is > > > http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/servicemix-jms.html > > > > > > The main difference is that servicemix-jms is a JBI compliant binding > > > component, > > > whereas the first one is a lightweight component. I would advise to > use > > > servicemix-jms > > > whic has more features (still lacking JCA support though) and can also > > > be > > > configured > > > in a static servicemix.xml configuration file. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > > > > On 6/2/06, william kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi. > > > > I find that there are two sets of packages for components in service > > > mix > > > > > > > > 1. org.apache.servicemix.components.jms > > > > 2. org.apache.servicemix.jms > > > > > > > > Can any one tell me the difference? Which is the package that needs > to > > > > used > > > > to configure JMS endpoints and why? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > William > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
