thanks, in my case i think i'm better of using jms binding for the addressing and leaving the flows unclustered.
is there a way to have message properties transported when using servicemix-jms? gnodet wrote: > > The main point when using jms or jca flow is that two jbi endpoints > activated with the same service name / endpoint name are considered > as a unique endpoint, with load-balancing between them. If you do not > want this behavior, you need to give them different names, as direct > jbi endpoint addressing is not supported by these flows. > > On 11/13/06, jep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> when using jmsFlow, is it possible to prevent certain components from >> being >> clustered? i want to be able to address components (that exist in a >> number >> of clustered containers) relative to their container without having to >> give >> them unique endpoints. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/jmsFlow-component-addressing-tf2620581s12049.html#a7312674 >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jmsFlow-component-addressing-tf2620581s12049.html#a7332696 Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
