kitplummer wrote:
>
>
>
> Mark T. wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> bsnyder wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/3/07, Mark T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If I am only using the binary installations of ServiceMix. Do I have
>>>> to have
>>>> maven installed?
>>>>
>>>> I am planning on using ant for any JBI packaging or static
>>>> configuration.
>>>
>>> No, Maven is not required if you're only using the binary download.
>>> Maven is required if you are:
>>>
>>> a) Building the ServiceMix source code
>>> b) Using ServiceMix Maven archetypes to create SU and SA project
>>> skeletons
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>> --
>>> perl -e 'print
>>> unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>>> );'
>>>
>>> Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
>>> Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
>>> Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
>>> Castor - http://castor.org/
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Can you clarify SU and SA? thanks.
>>
>
> I finally got my blog back up. I'd posted a screencast of putting
> together a SU/SA package a while back - think it might be beneficial to
> see the power of the maven archetypes.
>
> http://www.blackholelogic.com/assets/2007/7/5/servicemix-lwcontainer_screencast.mov
>
>
Thanks for all the info. The main point I am curious to find out is that
while most of the examples, in the links that were provided, use maven to
create SU/SA packages. Is it possible to create functioning SU/SA packages
with out using Maven? Is there a significant difference in effort to create
the packages in something other than maven? Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ServiceMix-without-Maven-tf4020828s12049.html#a11448595
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
