kitplummer wrote:
>
> On 7/5/07, Mark T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> kitplummer wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Mark T. wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> bsnyder wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On 7/3/07, Mark T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If I am only using the binary installations of ServiceMix. Do I
>> have
>> >>>> to have
>> >>>> maven installed?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I am planning on using ant for any JBI packaging or static
>> >>>> configuration.
>> >>>
>> >>> No, Maven is not required if you're only using the binary download.
>> >>> Maven is required if you are:
>> >>>
>> >>> a) Building the ServiceMix source code
>> >>> b) Using ServiceMix Maven archetypes to create SU and SA project
>> >>> skeletons
>> >>>
>> >>> Bruce
>> >>> --
>> >>> perl -e 'print
>> >>> unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
>> >>> PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>> >>> );'
>> >>>
>> >>> Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
>> >>> Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
>> >>> Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
>> >>> Castor - http://castor.org/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Can you clarify SU and SA? thanks.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I finally got my blog back up. I'd posted a screencast of putting
>> > together a SU/SA package a while back - think it might be beneficial to
>> > see the power of the maven archetypes.
>> >
>> >
>> http://www.blackholelogic.com/assets/2007/7/5/servicemix-lwcontainer_screencast.mov
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> Thanks for all the info. The main point I am curious to find out is
>> that
>> while most of the examples, in the links that were provided, use maven to
>> create SU/SA packages. Is it possible to create functioning SU/SA
>> packages
>> with out using Maven? Is there a significant difference in effort to
>> create
>> the packages in something other than maven? Thanks
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/ServiceMix-without-Maven-tf4020828s12049.html#a11448595
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
> I think you've answered your own question. The lack of
> examples/documentation on using Ant to package JBI stuff would signify
> a difference of effort. I believe some of the examples still have Ant
> builds - but, I don't think they really show any of the packaging
> (SA). Might check the loan-broker example.
>
> Is there a reason why you want to stay away from Maven?
>
>
Thanks for the answer. As a system administrator I am trying to determine
requirements for the use/support for ServiceMix and or Maven. As Maven
would require an additional repository to maintain in my environment, I was
curious if not using Maven was an option; while still providing developers
the tools to develop and deploy packages to Service Mix.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ServiceMix-without-Maven-tf4020828s12049.html#a11449461
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
