I'm referring to Nodet's response to my original question:
"or using
spring
just inject an instance of the second service into the first one:"
I was just wondering why one would want to do this, when they have the other
option available.
On 8/31/07, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/30/07, Ryan Moquin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's why I was surprised about the option to inject a bean directly...
> it
> > almost sounds like going through the NMR would be worthless in that
> > respect. So it's just another option if you didn't care to take
> advantage
> > of the functionality the NMR provides.
>
> I"m not sure what you mean by 'the option to inject a bean directly'
> if you don't want to take advantage of the functionality the NMR
> provides? I'm not understanding this statement at all, please clarify.
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
> Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
> Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
> Castor - http://castor.org/
>
