Mainly if you really need performances over flexibility.
If you inject a direct reference, there will be no marshalling and
unmarshalling.
On Aug 31, 2007, at 2:59 PM, Ryan Moquin wrote:
I'm referring to Nodet's response to my original question:
"or using
spring
just inject an instance of the second service into the first one:"
I was just wondering why one would want to do this, when they have
the other
option available.
On 8/31/07, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/30/07, Ryan Moquin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's why I was surprised about the option to inject a bean
directly...
it
almost sounds like going through the NMR would be worthless in that
respect. So it's just another option if you didn't care to take
advantage
of the functionality the NMR provides.
I"m not sure what you mean by 'the option to inject a bean directly'
if you don't want to take advantage of the functionality the NMR
provides? I'm not understanding this statement at all, please
clarify.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Castor - http://castor.org/
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
