Please check this
http://technet.oracle.com/tech/java/sqlj_jdbc/pdf/jdbcperf.pdf
<http://technet.oracle.com/tech/java/sqlj_jdbc/pdf/jdbcperf.pdf>
OCI is a little bit faster than thin and from our experience some special
Chinese Characters CANNOT be displayed using Thin Client but only OCI, e.g.
Big5 code in F9xx range.
FYI
Kenneth Kwan
-----Original Message-----
From: Wilson. P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 2:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 'Thin driver is best for Applet while OCI is best
for Servlet'
Hi all
I have a basic doubt.
From this mailing list, I found that
'Thin driver is best for Applet while OCI is best for Servlet'
Is this true?. But, I'm using the opposite way.....Pls explain...
TIA
-wilson
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in
the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives:
http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources:
http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
