"Kwan, Kenneth Y" wrote:
>
> Please check this
> http://technet.oracle.com/tech/java/sqlj_jdbc/pdf/jdbcperf.pdf
> <http://technet.oracle.com/tech/java/sqlj_jdbc/pdf/jdbcperf.pdf>
>
> OCI is a little bit faster than thin and from our experience some special
> Chinese Characters CANNOT be displayed using Thin Client but only OCI, e.g.
> Big5 code in F9xx range.
>
> FYI
>
> Kenneth Kwan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wilson. P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 2:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 'Thin driver is best for Applet while OCI is best
> for Servlet'
>
> Hi all
>
> I have a basic doubt.
>
> From this mailing list, I found that
>
> 'Thin driver is best for Applet while OCI is best for Servlet'
>
> Is this true?. But, I'm using the opposite way.....Pls explain...
>
> TIA
> -wilson
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in
> the body
> of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
>
> Archives:
> http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
> Resources:
"signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
--------------------------------------------------------------
QuantumLink Communications, Bombay, India
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
