Preston L. Bannister wrote:

> As a start I would suggest *accepting* UTF8 everywhere ASCII (8859_1)
> is accepted now.  I don't think this will break anything, and would
> support all (or most?) local character sets.
>
> I think this is pretty much a no-brainer.

-1

8859_1 is not ASCII.  ASCII is 7-bit, 8859_1/Latin-1 is 8-bit.
UTF8 and 8859_1 are only the same for the first 128 characters, so a
conversion from what is now Latin-1 to UTF8 would break for all pages
containing chars between 128 and 255 that have throughout time assumed
Latin-1 as the default.  To make this change you'd have a lot of upset
Spanish, German, and French speakers.

> Second you might consider *generating* UTF8 everywhere ASCII (8859_1)
> is generated now.  I don't think this will break anything,

-1

It *would* break things.

-jh-

___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".

Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html

Reply via email to